Trump Toughens Iran Peace Deal Terms as Negotiations Enter Critical Phase
US Sends Revised Proposal to Tehran Amid Efforts to End Nearly Three-Month Conflict
The United States has reportedly submitted a revised peace proposal to Iran after President Donald Trump pushed for tougher conditions in ongoing negotiations aimed at ending the nearly three-month war involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran.
According to multiple U.S. media reports, the updated framework strengthens several key provisions that Trump considers essential before approving a final agreement, potentially delaying a breakthrough but keeping diplomatic efforts alive.
Trump Seeks Stronger Commitments From Iran
Reports from U.S. officials indicate that Trump requested modifications to the proposed agreement before giving final approval.
While the exact changes have not been publicly disclosed, sources familiar with the discussions say the revisions focus heavily on Iran’s nuclear activities and long-term security commitments.
Axios reported that Trump wanted stronger guarantees regarding Iran’s nuclear materials and future compliance with any agreement.
A senior U.S. official told reporters that Iran could take several days to respond to the revised proposal.
“There will be a deal,” the official said, while cautioning that negotiations could take days or even longer before a final decision is reached.
Iran Signals Tough Stance in Talks
Iranian leaders have continued to stress that any agreement must protect the country’s national interests and sovereignty.
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s chief negotiator and newly re-elected parliamentary speaker, stated that Tehran would not accept a deal based solely on American promises.
“There is no trust in the enemy’s words and promises,” Ghalibaf said, emphasizing that Iran expects concrete results before fulfilling its own commitments.
The comments highlight the deep mistrust that continues to complicate negotiations despite progress made in recent weeks.
Nuclear Program Remains Central Issue
One of the biggest obstacles remains Iran’s nuclear program.
Trump has repeatedly stated that any agreement must include a guarantee that Iran will never develop nuclear weapons.
However, Iranian officials continue to insist that the country has no intention of building nuclear arms.
Adding to the debate, former U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress in 2025 that U.S. intelligence agencies assessed Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon.
Despite those assessments, Washington continues to seek stronger safeguards and verification measures in any final agreement.
Strait of Hormuz Dispute Continues
The future of the Strait of Hormuz remains another major point of contention.
The strategic waterway carries roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil supply, making its security critical for global energy markets.
Trump has repeatedly called for the reopening of the Strait as part of any peace settlement.
However, Iran recently reaffirmed its authority over the shipping corridor and warned that foreign commercial and military vessels must comply with Iranian regulations while transiting the area.
The dispute has become one of the most sensitive aspects of the negotiations because of its direct impact on international trade and energy prices.
Risk of Renewed Fighting Remains
Although a ceasefire has significantly reduced large-scale hostilities, experts warn that delays in reaching a formal agreement could increase the risk of renewed military action.
Security analysts note that the absence of a finalized peace framework leaves both sides vulnerable to misunderstandings, isolated clashes, or political pressure that could trigger another escalation.
Recent military incidents in the Gulf have already demonstrated how fragile the current ceasefire remains.
Agreement Still Possible
Despite the challenges, officials on both sides continue to express cautious optimism that a deal can eventually be reached.
Negotiators are expected to continue discussions over the coming days as Washington awaits Tehran’s response to the revised proposal.
If successful, an agreement could help stabilize the region, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, reduce tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, and ease pressure on global energy markets.
For now, however, the final outcome remains uncertain as both governments seek terms they can accept without appearing to compromise their core interests.
